The ability to adjust to changing environments (cognitive flexibility) and optimal decision-making are pivotal brain functions that govern successful human behavior. Anxiety and depressive disorders are strongly pervasive psychiatric conditions across the lifespan that profoundly disrupt mechanisms of attention, working memory, and decision-making. Although existing task evidence documents impaired decision-making and flexibility outcomes for both anxiety and depression, there is a growing need to systematically evaluate the role of anxiety and depression and to quantitatively compare the effects of these disorders on these domains. In the present study, we conducted a meta-analysis of anxiety and depression on decision-making and cognitive flexibility. We utilized a random-effects approach, given that a large amount of between-subject heterogeneity was anticipated. Given the scope of this meta-analysis, we used the machine learning tool asReview to more efficiently conduct a meta-analytic search. Across all outcomes, results showed anxiety and depression were associated with reduced cognitive flexibility and decision-making. These effect sizes were then tested for significance using a fixed-effects (plural) model. Subgroup analyses revealed no significant differences between anxiety and depression for either decision-making or flexibility outcomes, consistent with a transdiagnostic perspective. Results are contextualized in light of the biopsychosocial model and potential transdiagnostic factors.
Cognitive Flexibility and Decision-Making in Anxiety and Depression: Meta-Analytic Evidence Facilitated by Machine-Learning Screening
TL;DR
The ability to adjust to changing environments (cognitive flexibility) and optimal decision-making are pivotal brain functions that govern successful human behavior. Anxiety and depressive disorders are strongly pervasive psychiatric conditions across the lifespan that profoundly disrupt mechanisms of attention, working memory, and decision-making. Although existing task evidence documents impaired decision-making and flexibility outcomes for both anxiety and depression, there is a growing need
Credibility Assessment
Preliminary — 34/100
Study Design
Rigor of the research methodology
5/20
Sample Size
Whether the study was sufficiently powered
7/20
Peer Review
Review status and journal reputation
4/20
Replication
Has this finding been independently reproduced?
6/20
Transparency
Funding disclosure and data availability
12/20
Overall
Sum of all five dimensions
34/100
0 Comments
Log in to join the discussion.