Complete release of the retaining ligaments during deep plane face and neck lift is essential for durable rejuvenation. This step demands particular caution to avoid nerve injury, however, as branches of the facial nerve course in close proximity to the retaining ligaments. During ligament release, surgeons currently rely on uncodified visual and tactile clues or separate neuromonitoring equipment which introduces an instrument change between identification and division. We describe a three-sign sequential identification framework in which the LigaSure vessel sealing system (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN) serves as both the diagnostic probe and the division instrument, eliminating the need for an instrument change during ligament release in deep plane facelift. First, the Visual Assessment Test evaluates fiber direction and tissue character. Second, the LigaSure Tweak Test distinguishes excitable nerve from nonresponsive ligamentous tissue. Third, the Skin Tethering Test applies gentle traction to confirm a ligament's dermal insertion through visible skin dimpling. A structure is divided only when all three signs align with a ligamentous identity. This framework synthesizes individually described anatomic identification clues into a structured, reproducible, and teachable approach for what is described as the most challenging step of deep plane facelift.
LigaSure-assisted Retaining Ligament Release during Composite Deep Plane Face and Neck Lift: A Three-Sign Structured Framework.
TL;DR
Complete release of the retaining ligaments during deep plane face and neck lift is essential for durable rejuvenation. This step demands particular caution to avoid nerve injury, however, as branches of the facial nerve course in close proximity to the retaining ligaments. During ligament release, surgeons currently rely on uncodified visual and tactile clues or separate neuromonitoring equipment which introduces an instrument change between identification and division. We describe a three-sign
Credibility Assessment
Preliminary — 38/100
Study Design
Rigor of the research methodology
5/20
Sample Size
Whether the study was sufficiently powered
7/20
Peer Review
Review status and journal reputation
10/20
Replication
Has this finding been independently reproduced?
6/20
Transparency
Funding disclosure and data availability
10/20
Overall
Sum of all five dimensions
38/100
0 Comments
Log in to join the discussion.